Depersonalization symptoms - age or wear and tear?

**Posts:** 12131 · by **Richard@DecisionSkills** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 5:14 pm

Algorithm wrote:You have made several insinuations that are more far-reaching than mere labels.

Insinuations...that is the best you have to offer? You want to claim you are a victim of a "cyberbully" because someone insinuates things that you find uncomfortable? That will make for a difficult life. But, if that is the path you choose it is up to you. See how it works out for you.

You are a 30'ish year old male, currently unemployed, and financially dependent on a parent and/or society to provide for you. You are sexually inexperienced, socially isolating yourself while seeking your "soulmate" based on psychic prophecy via online chats with women in a "creepy" (your words) manner. You believe good looks and superior intellect allows you to charm almost any women that you desire. You never make mistakes and have no regrets.

The above isn't insinuation. And it isn't an attempt to put you down. It is my understanding, roughly speaking, of your current situation and impression of yourself.

I'm not insinuating anything. Point blank, and very openly, I think your current worldview is horrible. I think your philosophy of how the world works, or is suppose to work, is highly dysfunctional. I'm not saying I'm correct. I'm saying it is not a life that I would ever want to live or wish upon anyone else. If I found myself in such conditions, I would try to figure out what I was doing wrong. I would take some time to self reflect, humble myself, acknowledge my errors, and try to figure out a new path, a better way forward so as to not keep repeating the same mistakes.

That you are currently going down a dark path in life is not an attack on you as a person. That you currently hold a dysfunctional view of the world, a bad map that leads to nowhere good, is not an attack on you as a person.

**Posts:** 2958 · by **quietvoice** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 5:17 pm

Algorithm wrote:You think that they know what they are doing (if I read you correctly). I don't think that they know what they are doing.

Which "they" are you talking about? And what to you think "they" are doing?

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 5:52 pm

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:You are a 30'ish year old male, currently unemployed, and financially dependent on a parent and/or society to provide for you. You are sexually inexperienced, socially isolating yourself while seeking your "soulmate" based on psychic prophecy via online chats with women in a "creepy" (your words) manner. You believe good looks and superior intellect allows you to charm almost any women that you desire. You never make mistakes and have no regrets.

The above isn't insinuation. And it isn't an attempt to put you down. It is my understanding, roughly speaking, of your current situation and impression of yourself.

Why do you feel the need to define me? And why only with unflattering "facts"? What would the purpose be? Is that all there is to me? Of course not, but you wish to highlight the not so flattering, cause you're a prick. I can define you too, in a not so great light. You do not want me to define you.

I think your current worldview is horrible.

Who cares?

I think your philosophy of how the world works, or is suppose to work, is highly dysfunctional.

I'll tell you one thing. I don't think people change much regardless of age, unlike you. I don't think you will ever look back on your conduct here with me, disown it, and apologize to me.

There's my view of the world.

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 5:56 pm

quietvoice wrote:
Algorithm wrote:You think that they know what they are doing (if I read you correctly). I don't think that they know what they are doing.

Which "they" are you talking about? And what to you think "they" are doing?

The pharmaceutical companies and or government. I think they have honest intentions in this particular instance since it effects everybody, including themselves. I wrote that they don't know what they are doing, what the potential side effects of the vaccine could be.

And so I will not take something that usually takes 20 years to produce and have approved...

Call me crazy

**Posts:** 12131 · by **Richard@DecisionSkills** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:05 pm

Algorithm wrote: and apologize to me.

For what, the "insinuations" that made you feel uncomfortable? What exactly have I stated that you believe merits an apology?

I know that you don't like the fact that your mother is not as ignorant as you wish to believe. I am aware that you are uncomfortable with my observation that your mother has more sexual experience than you. But, that is on you not me. The observation was a result of you discussing your mothers sexual prowess with the man with a scar on his chest. You brought that up. I didn't. And then you followed up by slandering your mother as ignorant when she provided you advice on the lawyer. You did that. I didn't.

You want me to apologize for calling your mother wise? To apologize for saying your mother is not as ignorant as you wish to believe? Is that what you think merits and apology?

Or was it something else I said?

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:24 pm

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:For what, the "insinuations" that made you feel uncomfortable? What exactly have I stated that you believe merits an apology?

I know that you don't like the fact that your mother is not as ignorant as you wish to believe. I am aware that you are uncomfortable with my observation that your mother has more sexual experience than you. But, that is on you not me. The observation was a result of you discussing your mothers sexual prowess with the man with a scar on his chest. You brought that up. I didn't. And then you followed up by slandering your mother as ignorant when she provided you advice on the lawyer. You did that. I didn't.

You want me to apologize for calling your mother wise? To apologize for saying your mother is not as ignorant as you wish to believe? Is that what you think merits and apology?

Or was it something else I said?

You have bulldozed me around me as an object lesson to your crowd of supporters (in your mind or the external world). I am not going to take crap from a nobody. If it was Johnny Depp, someone who is actually successful with women, then fine, beat me up.

I am not going to take it from some social science low-life, with thousands of posts, who ironically enough thinks that I'm living my life online. Takes one to know one, right?

You are not going to come out of this looking pretty. I have already told you that you picked the wrong guy.

**Posts:** 12131 · by **Richard@DecisionSkills** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:33 pm

Algorithm wrote: You are not going to come out of this looking pretty.

What do you mean by "this"? I'm not going to come out of a forum discussion "looking pretty"?

If you say so. On a scale of 1 to 10 of important things in life, coming out of this "looking pretty" ranks...well, it doesn't even register on the scale it is that insignificant.

But, okay. Knock yourself out. Humor me. Provide me with something for me to enjoy.

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:49 pm

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:
If you say so. On a scale of 1 to 10 of important things in life, coming out of this "looking pretty" ranks...well, it doesn't even register on the scale it is that insignificant.

But, okay. Knock yourself out. Humor me. Provide me with something for me to enjoy.

You don't care about losing credibility? You are promoting your business in your username.

I guess you hang around like a weasel in places where there are few views? Try and pick on some "aspie incel".

Fool.

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 6:53 pm

Then you use the classic psychological trick of trying to smooth things over. "Algorithm can improve". "Algorithm is intelligent." To make yourself look bigger, better, and wiser.

Douche chills....

**Posts:** 12131 · by **Richard@DecisionSkills** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:02 pm

Algorithm wrote: You are promoting your business in your username.

I'm not anonymous. I'm easy enough to find.

If you want to spend the time and effort for me to "lose credibility" outside of this forum, have fun with that. Enjoy.

**Posts:** 2958 · by **quietvoice** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:18 pm

Algorithm wrote:The pharmaceutical companies and or government. I think they have honest intentions in this particular instance since it effects[sic] everybody, including themselves. I wrote that they don't know what they are doing, what the potential side effects of the vaccine could be.

Do you think that the "virus" is real?

If you think that pharma companies and governments have honest intentions, ever, you need to do a whole heck of a lot of research and reflection.

**Posts:** 2958 · by **quietvoice** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:34 pm

Algorithm wrote: I am not going to take crap from a nobody.

quietvoice wrote:—just go no contact. Simple.

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:41 pm

quietvoice wrote:Do you think that the "virus" is real?

Dear lord, yes!

quietvoice wrote:If you think that pharma companies and governments have honest intentions, ever, you need to do a whole heck of a lot of research and reflection.

What would the alternative purpose be if they weren't? How would that be more profitable?

**Posts:** 2958 · by **quietvoice** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 7:54 pm

Algorithm wrote:
quietvoice wrote:Do you think that the "virus" is real?

Dear lord, yes!

Why?

Algorithm wrote:
quietvoice wrote:If you think that pharma companies and governments have honest intentions, ever, you need to do a whole heck of a lot of research and reflection.

What would the alternative purpose be if they weren't? How would that be more profitable?

Ever hear of The Great Reset?

I really don't want to spoon feed you. As it is, I don't like the way you communicate with the members here.

Turn off the tell-lie-vision and do your own research. Beware, though, that much censorship is going on on major social network platforms, so much of what you need to find is on alternative platforms.

**Posts:** 416 · by **Algorithm** » Fri Jun 18, 2021 8:16 pm

quietvoice wrote:Why?

Why not?? Fill in the blanks for me. The companies do have agendas and might distort the truth (like politicians). That's different from thinking it's all a conspiracy.

quietvoice wrote:
I really don't want to spoon feed you. As it is, I don't like the way you communicate with the members here.
.

You do like me though, for whatever reason. There was a switch. It was the German for me. I'll admit it.

Your anti authoritarian "causes" exemplifies lots of aspies. If I didn't know better, I'd think you're an aspie (quietvoice freaking out!!!).

Come clean, are you a a self hating aspie?

Depersonalization symptoms - age or wear and tear?

#45

#46

#47

#48

#49

#50

#51

#52

#53

#54

#55

#56

#57

#58

#59

Main Menu

Recent posts

Active topics

Contact Us