Your baked brain.

quietvoice wrote:

tokeless wrote:Of course I can see them because they are there. This idea has been so debunked over the years, but this only fuels ( no pun intended) the conspiracy because as Christine Keeler said, "They would say that wouldn't they?".. you will probably do similar and tell me I'm programmed or ignorant... there is no answer that would make you see it's physics. They've shown chem trails during ww2 from planes. If they were doing anything sinister it's sure taking a long time.

Of course. Have a blessed day and remember to not get involved in conversations in which you know so little that you become irrelevant. It can be an ego buster.

So, because I don't just agree with your fruit loop theories I become the one that 'doesn't know anything'. You can't answer any questions that don't fit your beliefs, so you revert to I'm the ignorant one. What are the chem trails for? What do they contain that makes them a threat?

tokeless wrote:What are the chem trails for? What do they contain that makes them a threat?

I encourage you to do your own research. I had too much time with you back and forth on another thread where you didn't want to drop the pre-programmed responses from your psyche before doing some honest research, much less any ongoing research at that. Beware, you might have to go to the dreaded internet to obtain some information!

quietvoice wrote:

tokeless wrote:What are the chem trails for? What do they contain that makes them a threat?

I encourage you to do your own research. I had too much time with you back and forth on another thread where you didn't want to drop the pre-programmed responses from your psyche before doing some honest research, much less any ongoing research at that. Beware, you might have to go to the dreaded internet to obtain some information!

I already have and they are benign. It's water vapour and varying weather factors... there is no evidence that they are more than that. Hence why I ask what you think they are...

tokeless wrote:I already have and they are benign. It's water vapour and varying weather factors... there is no evidence that they are more than that. Hence why I ask what you think they are...

Okay. You didn't do actual research. No surprise.

I'm looking at CK pictures to see if I can verify MTF, but there aren't enough photos on giggle-images for me to make a for sure identification as such. MTF and FTM are the fun games that the "elites" like to play on the public—another crazy thing that you could look into. Deception all around. Call me crazy. Go ahead, I dare you, ha ha.

tokeless wrote:Hey Bio.. any chance of some peer reviewed evidence to back up your big mouth? You like throwing insults about, so you really need to support what you say or you're just a big mouth...

How about you just do what you said you would do. Bye now!

biohack9 wrote:

tokeless wrote:Hey Bio.. any chance of some peer reviewed evidence to back up your big mouth? You like throwing insults about, so you really need to support what you say or you're just a big mouth...

How about you just do what you said you would do. Bye now!

I thought as much.. all mouth.

How about you just do what you said you would do. Bye now![/quote]

I thought as much.. all mouth.[/quote]

Man you’re dense as F. You’re really something special if you think Paws doesn’t exist, like seriously special needs and brain damaged. Keep trolling, and keep not doing what you said you would. You’re basically saying everyone on this forum would be fine if they didn’t believe paws existed. Like how stupid can someone really be??? You just lowered the bar. Hard. Classic troll behaviour. Again.

Show me your evidence and back up what you think... throwing your mouth off is just you trying not to admit your all talk.

tokeless wrote:Show me your evidence and back up what you think... throwing your mouth off is just you trying not to admit your all talk.

So you’re either lazy or stupid or both. But keep beeking your parroting. And trolling. And denying that great neurochemical changes occur with acute and post acute withdrawal. I can’t even believe I have to keep explaining this to you!

You’re not experiencing paws nor ever have so it’s easy to see how damn clueless you are. Yet here you are!

potsleep wrote:Yeah I kinda disagree. I quit weed and nicotine cold turkey over 4 months ago and only now staring to feel somewhat human. I could care less about using. Actually the thought of using again scares me to death. I had no idea how bad the physical and mental withdrawal symptoms would be. I had no choices there. Glad it was no problem for you.

It’s not fun sweating through 5 shirts a day for 3 weeks, not sleeping for 15 days and crying for no reason. Throw in a trip to ER on New Year’s Eve and constant anxiety and depression while trying to balance a full time career, family and social life.

People are scared and looking for comfort here. I don’t think they’re just making it up so they can start smoking again.

I totally agree. I had no desire mentally to take any more gummies after I quit 4 weeks ago. I couldn't care less. But 4 days after quitting where I'm crying and sweating and dreaming scary dreams I clued in that I was in withdrawal. I had no idea there would be withdrawal from pot. But I experienced exactly the same symptoms when I abruptly stopped taking Ativan in 2006. Anyone who says there is no physical withdrawal is just wrong. Maybe the total amount of THC they were ingesting wasn't high enough to trigger withdrawal symptoms. I don't know. I only know what I feel and it's scary. I'm taking Tylenol when it gets really bad and it seems to help. I'm supposed to be having surgery on December 15 and I talked to the doctor about it and he said it should be fine. But I'm alone and I'm worried that being alone after surgery might trigger a lot more anxiety and fear. I'm forging ahead but I hate feeling this way. I'm relieved I'm at least able to get to sleep even with the weird dreams.

Just ignore the Tokeless troll that believes paws is all anxiety. This “addictions specialist” doesn’t even know what cb1/cb2 receptors are let alone hormonal and neurotransmitter changes. Withdrawals are often why some people commit suicide coming off anti depressants cold turkey but this troll keeps saying it’s “all in your head”. Funny enough, anxiety is one of the only symptoms that I DONT experience! Lol.

100% physical. He doesn’t understand that anxiety can be a symptom of paws. He seems to conflate the two. Or just likes to troll and argue.

Have you found the evidence for weed PAWS yet? We're talking weed, not other drugs which can have physical symptoms so don't conflate the two... evidence please.

tokeless wrote:Have you found the evidence for weed PAWS yet? We're talking weed, not other drugs which can have physical symptoms so don't conflate the two... evidence please.

How about you describe what you define as evidence in this instance (weed post-acute withdrawal syndrome). I ask because . . . as you (should) know (and a member has somewhere here reminded us) the drug/metabolites/whatever is stored in fat tissue, which means it sticks around until it has a chance to be eliminated from the body.

Do you think that the elimination is always done silently without any notice on the part of the person living in his body, or might it be that it could, depending on other conditions, be keenly felt by that person in his body?

Ever hear of detoxification in regards to one's general health? It isn't always a comfortable experience, hence, not many people are mentally able to handle it without knowing what they are going through, and so go back to their drug of choice, which is food-stuffs not meant for the human organism.

Quiet voice, best not to feed the troll. It’s evident and obvious at this point that he doesn’t have a single clue. To be ignorant that there are biological processes going on and that dopamine downregulation alone occurs and can takes years to resensitize is beyond anything I can even fathom. And that’s not even including the endocannabinoid system and hormonal changes that cannabis affects.

Just ignore the troll, he’s fishing hard for attention at this point. Any real addiction specialist would laugh at him. I actually spoke to one yesterday about it. Most actually have a clue and are helpful. But they’re educated and know how to research and would never have the time to troll like he does. Like he’s never even experienced paws lol

biohack9 wrote:Quiet voice, best not to feed the troll.

I understand who I'm dealing with. I still want to hear his answer on what constitutes "evidence" in his mind. I understand that he has (little or) no capacity to look beyond his cultural programming—like most people, frankly.