Hi again Herbie
Herbie306 wrote:during this time my emotions have begun crashing down on me. It's as if I'm grieving for everything I previously haven't been able to; I'm crying like a baby, I want my mum, I'd do anything to be comforted and I'm finding the whole thing pretty scary. If I had to say which approach I needed right now, I'd say it was primal therapy (or something along those lines).
I thought you were going to say the approach you needed was Dr Cadbury's! I'm glad you've made the connection between addiction and past pain. We develop addictions to soothe our Problems, so when we try to put the brakes on we're confronted with everything we don't want to face.
in the past I've always thought they must be too good to be true - magic wands don't exist. Do they?
There are a number of them! In the early 90s I was a guinea-pig for Jacob Liberman's colour therapy, administered by a rebel optometrist here in Oz. (Liberman is American.) I was investigating on behalf of the magazine I was working for and was stunned by its effect on me, so my published report swamped the optometrist with eager clients.
The treatment involved shining coloured lights into a person's eyes at varying flash rates. I found the results quite overwhelming. It might have been different if I'd had more than one session, ie. if I'd been on a course of treatment. As it was, I just knew this was a potent way of bringing unresolved issues to the fore.
One of my colleagues has moved on from psychotherapy to EMDR, so I've been a guinea-pig for her too but over a longer time. It's certainly gentler than colour therapy. Naturally my friend (since the 80s) knows my 'stuff' and the optometrist didn't, which might skew the data in her favour. In my experience of EMDR there's no feeling of re-experiencing primal emotions or having past traumas come up and smack me in the face (which was the case with colour therapy). I suppose it could also be claimed that the colour therapy had already ripped out the worst of it.
One thing to bear in mind is that therapists of any flavour have come from varying backgrounds and experience. For example, my friend didn't (and couldn't, and wouldn't want to) abandon everything she knew about psychotherapy when she started practising EMDR. Generally speaking, a therapist with more years of practice behind her is going to bring far more to the experience than someone who graduated last week. And those who've been around for a while have always investigated many other ways of working, integrating what they perceive as effective into their work. So you're never going to get the same kind of treatment from any two therapists of any kind.
I know Rogerian therapy doesn't touch me; I can talk until I'm blue in the face and nothing will shift.
In light of the above I would say it depends which Rogerian therapist you're talking to. Also it depends how many shifts have taken place in you since your previous encounter with therapy.
You say you
know talk therapy doesn't work. I'm sure you're aware of this, but for the benefit of any lurkers I'll point out that the things we
know have more impact on our lives than any external cues ever will. Therefore talk therapy is a waste of time for you.
I've thought about being hypnotised but I'm not sure I know enough about it.
... and that might be a good thing, but only if you go into it at least 50 per cent convinced it's effective.
To the untrained eye

I and (not-so-coincidentally) the majority of people in my contacts book look like tree-hugging new agers. A significant number of us have degrees or doctorates as well as a healthy dose of cynicism. Time and again one of us will start an anecdote: "Something weird happened with one of my clients..."
Conversely, every now and again I meet Mr or Ms Cynical Pragmatist, those people who trust only what they can perceive with at least one of their five senses. My best friend is Chief Pragmatist; perhaps that's
why she's my best friend. I often find myself envying the CPs because their lives and their decision-making look so uncomplicated to me. It works for them, too, lucky devils. They immediately discount any psychic experience as coincidence; in fact my best friend would tell you she's never
had a psychic experience. Just like your knowledge of talk therapy, I know I could never be a pragmatist without some kind of lobotomy.
Though maybe I don't need therapy at all?
When you get to "I don't need therapy at all" without the maybe and the question mark, it will be the truth. Whether you can get there on your own is another matter, because usually it takes outside factors to change our minds, and a good talk therapist would question your ideas about yourself. For example:
Maybe I just need a big kick; to count my blessings, go out and help others more, live on my own and support myself?
What do you mean by a big kick? If you mean a wild sexual experience, an acid trip or a thrilling car chase, maybe you do. If (as I suspect) a "big kick" involves a heavy boot aimed your way... Ouch! You've already had too many of them. You need a warm hug more than you need another dose of violence.
Count your blessings? Yes, when noticing what's good in your life lifts your spirits. If there's any suspicion of "Herbie you ungrateful brat, what's the matter with you?" -- again, that's an attack on yourself.
Go out and help others? Again, lovely stuff. When it arises spontaneously almost all of us find it boosts self-esteem. But (always a but!), could it mean "I'm not worth much unless I'm doing something for someone else. Others matter more than I do. What a selfish person I am!" etc.?
Living on your own and supporting yourself? Fabulous, if you're up to it. If you suspect you're not yet, don't even consider it. It sounds a bit hermit-like, too. Are you unworthy of others' support? Do you realise supporting and being supported are what connects our species?
I previously thought they would clash with each other
I reckon if two or more therapies clash, one of them isn't right for you. You don't need to know which of them actually worked, you only need to know
something did.
Though thinking about it, as long as I use one therapy at a time and inform my current counsellor if and when I return, there shouldn't be a problem.
If I were your therapist a statement like this would inspire me to ask whether you were concerned about offending me.
I think this is where I've been going wrong all my life;
What if I told you -- and kept telling you -- that you've been going
right all your life and always will? That the challenges in your life were put there so you would experience the joy of overcoming them? That you couldn't be happy if you'd never been sad? etc.
I seem to float around accepting stuff instead of doing this - over the years, I've gradually lost my fighting spirit.
There's nothing intrinsically wrong with acceptance. It's a big part of Buddhism as well as getting a mention in AA's serenity prayer. So when (not if) you look over your life with new eyes, you'll see you've had masses of experience and strength in the area of acceptance. Furthermore, you'll see your spirit moved you to accept some things and fight others; and that perhaps it
looks as though it didn't always discriminate too well between the two, but that you ended up where you were headed anyway.
If acceptance means "I've got other people's footprints all over me", we have some work to do.
Do you believe in homoeopathy? I do. A small targeted dose of what ails you, for some inexplicable reason, effects a cure. What if life in general were treating you homoeopathically? If your thoughts about "a big kick" were because just one more bit of violence would activate your violence-immunity?
I think I'll print it out and put it on my wall to remind me.
It's from
A Return To Love by Marianne Williamson. You could easily find the whole quote on the internet, or get a copy of the book. HarperCollins New York published it in 1992 and there are now several editions.