Depersonalization symptoms - age or wear and tear?

Algorithm wrote:

quietvoice wrote:Why?

Why not?? Fill in the blanks for me. The companies do have agendas and might distort the truth (like politicians). That's different from thinking it's all a conspiracy.

If it is a conspiracy, it's a pretty open conspiracy, since a lot of people outside of the insiders know about it, and "they" (the "conspirators") publish exactly what their plans are. EVER HEAR OF THE GREAT RESET?

To start with, look into the PCR test. You fill me in with what you find.

Algorithm wrote:

quietvoice wrote: As it is, I don't like the way you communicate with the members here.

You do like me though, for whatever reason.

I do not like you at all. If I saw you in real life, I'd steer clear of you. To me, you are nothing but trouble.

I write here for the fun of it.

quietvoice wrote:....

I already knew this before checking (call it a hunch..)

Care to reply?
https://www.bbc.com/news/55017002

Care to reply?
https://www.bbc.com/news/54893437

quietvoice wrote:I do not like you at all.

I don't believe that for a moment. You'll note that I had no part in this.. I've yet to randomly ask you anything.

Algorithm wrote:I already knew this before checking (call it a hunch..)
Care to reply? [bbc link]
Care to reply? [bbc link]

Interesting that I have to spell this part out to you. When I said turn off the television, that would include any mainstream media sources. Look at what people outside of the mainstream media sources have to tell you. Investigate for real. Ask questions about everything. Question everything.

Algorithm wrote:

quietvoice wrote:I do not like you at all.

I don't believe that for a moment. You'll note that I had no part in this.. I've yet to randomly ask you anything.

First off, my question was not random. At all.

You are irritating AF.

Done.
Over and out.

quietvoice wrote:
First off, my question was not random. At all.

You are irritating AF.

Done.
Over and out.

If I'm irritating AF, you're quirky AF (and trying to convert me). Did you really think an aspie would fall for this? They can't be hypnotized. It's well known. I'm impervious to your "charm". Feel free to discuss philosophy and ask another random question(!).

quietvoice wrote:First off, my question was not random. .

I know. You thought it was the vaccine shot that caused the depersonalization, didn't you? I know how your mind works.

Everybody I know who took the shot is doing fine. NOTHING has changed.

Get a grip.

Why is it that wherever I go, wherever I turn, humanity let's me down. This is as good as it gets, huh?

Well, the hell with it then.

Algorithm wrote:Why is it that wherever I go, wherever I turn, humanity let's me down...

Yes, why is that? What is the common denominator?

Why is it that wherever I go, wherever I turn, humanity doesn't let me down?

~

You get the pokey pokey,

And you end up in the ground,

That's what it's all about!

quietvoice wrote:~

You get the pokey pokey,

And you end up in the ground,

That's what it's all about!

Do you have a poster of L. Ron Hubbard in your bedroom?

Lets*

I thought it was wrong and it was... It's not my native language.. Sorry about that.

Algorithm wrote:Lets*

I thought it was wrong and it was... It's not my native language.. Sorry about that.

No problem, we all make mistakes.

Extensive investigation into vaccines and autism[1] has shown that there is no relationship between the two, causal or otherwise,[1][2][3] and that vaccine ingredients do not cause autism.[4] Vaccinologist Peter Hotez researched the growth of the false claim and concluded that its spread originated with Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent 1998 paper, with no prior paper supporting a link.[5]

Despite the scientific consensus for the absence of a relationship[1][2] and the retracted paper, the anti-vaccination movement at large continue to promote myths, conspiracy theories, and misinformation linking the two.[6]

A developing tactic appears to be the "promotion of irrelevant research [as] an active aggregation of several questionable or peripherally related research studies in an attempt to justify the science underlying a questionable claim."[7]

The claimed mechanisms have changed over time, in response to evidence refuting each in turn.[8]


I hear a quiet voice.

You also picked the wrong guy, dear

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:


No problem, we all make mistakes.

Sorry it didn't work out with the asian date 5 years ago (told you my memory is good). You stud.

I guess it's 6 years now. But who's counting!

My mother, who you are constantly siding with being infinitely wiser than me, asked me to promise her that I will never, under any circumstances, bring home an Asian.

Everybody knows what it means.