Regulus wrote: The current situation favors countries that are not liberal, not capitalist, and not democratic because they can adapt to the situation a lot quicker and easier. Just take a look a China. No recession, no civil unrest, and they've got the epidemic under control. And where did the virus came from? China? By an accident? I doubt...
I would suggest that neither you nor I have any clue what is actually taking place inside of China. Dictatorships control the media. Because I was trapped with a canceled visa in China last May/June, I continue to get periodic emails from the US embassy in Beijing. Those emails make it pretty clear that China doesn't have the epidemic under control. They are still locking down huge regions in an effort to control the virus. Still, I don't consider periodic emails from the embassy to be an accurate overall picture. And my friends in China don't seem to have any inside information either.
Maybe I'm wrong. Do you have access to credible information from inside of China that most of us do not have access to?
And if the basic needs of people can be satisfied then dictatorships typically are great at not having civil unrest regardless if there is a pandemic. I don't necessarily consider that a metric of success. Do you?
Think of it another way. A ship is sinking and two life rafts are launched. In one raft is a dictator. He recruits two brutes and they enforce "the law". He favors the brutes and gives them a larger share of the survival rations. Get out of line, offend the dictator, and you might just get tossed off the raft. They row to an island and given it is a dictatorship it is faster. Out of 15 people on the raft, two are tossed overboard. Still, 13 people make it to the island where the dictatorship continues.
In another raft, it is a bunch of liberals that believe in the voluntary exchange of labor. They start to row to another island but are much less efficient. They argue, there is unrest, and without a strong dictator one person throws another overboard. Then people fight and have a vote about what they should do with this murderer. What a mess as they slowly make their way to the island. By the time they get there only 11 make it to the island. Once on the island, the arguing continues as they vote in a new leader, they separate into factions, and everyone is free to engage in the voluntary exchange of labor.
Which life raft do you choose? What do you think happens with these two islands over the next several years? How do they develop?
I'm not saying which is better. Each raft has advantages and disadvantages. I will tell you which island I would prefer to live on...and it isn't the island with the dictator. You?
In other words, while you say the philosophy of "The West" is focused on "short term" profits and frame it as negative in comparison to a dictatorship, I would argue that your measures of success are short term. I think you are sacrificing the long term for a short term problem.
I would also argue that "The West" has adapted to a much larger degree. On a 10 point scale of freedom "The West" went from say an 8 back in 2019 to a 3 in 2020, and will make significant swing back towards freedom in 2021, 2022. Will it ever return to 8? I don't know. On the other hand, China went from a freedom level of 3 to a 2, and will possibly return to a 3. I don't think they adapted much at all.