Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:What do you mean by negative? Do you mean adrenaline - fear?
A loud or abrupt noise can create a reflexive response, adrenaline floods the body and the person "jumps" prior to identifying the source of the noise. It is part of "threat detection" which is hardwired. It isn't a suggestion. The person has no choice/decision.
A thunder clap is probably the best example in nature. With man made devices there is the flash-bang grenade. The response is automated. Processing of the noise takes a minimum of 100-200 milliseconds. As the person "jumps" they think, "That's thunder!"
The same happens with the other senses, e.g. sight and touch. A person will automatically duck in response to something moving rapidly in their peripheral vision. Or a person will quickly pull their hand away from a hot or sharp object. It takes 100-200 milliseconds to realize the rapid movement was just a harmless fly buzzing. It can take a fraction of a second for a person to realize they are burned or have been cut.
Is this what you mean by negative?
If so, then I would submit that the closest opposite or positive would be adrenaline - elation. If a person is stranded or has been isolated, then the sound of a human voice, or of a man made machine might trigger excitement, hope of rescue. If a person was searching for water, the sound of a bubbling brook might trigger elation. In a similar fashion to the reflexive responses, it would take 100-200 milliseconds to process, but the flow of adrenaline - elation would be automated, unstoppable.
thanks for your answer, sorry if I answer you so late, but I changed provider and it took them a long time to activate the line. You have fully understood my problem, I would like a person who knows nothing, as soon as he sees an object, can be influenced in a positive way through a sound. I had not thought of your solution and I must say that it is brilliant, but I had thought of two other solutions, tell me according to your point of view how I can conclude them both. Then the first provides for particular sound frequencies (I always speak of sound), which contribute to relaxation or excitement in accordance with your point of view, I believe that a sound around 432 hz can be optimal, but you tell me the right combination . So if in my first proposal I talk about particular frequencies, in my second hypothesis I talk to you about "emptying your mind" that is when we are able to think we are more inclined to accept what is proposed to us, even if in this second case perhaps we are talking about hypnosis, I believe that there may be a way to stop the brain from thinking I had thought that since we are not multitasking, when we listen to two different sounds we get confused and go into standby. Tell me how can I solve these two opinions of mine, I think you are the right person to help me. Ps: I'm sorry again if I write to you after so long but I didn't know how to connect to the internet