The Black Pill

Candid wrote:Spare a thought for those "living" under Dastardly Dan!
https://reclaimthenet.org/victorias-dan ... ctivities/ “well into the 2022”, when naturally he knows the coronahoax will just be revving up.

"Dictator Dan" is another nickname he's been given That's pretty fitting

Candid wrote:I would love any links you have to their academic papers or other work. TIA.

Try researchgate or academia.com. That’s what I’ve used for over a decade to find academic papers on topics I want to research.

That’s where I have found lots of great studies on the effectiveness of ivermectin and studies regarding comorbidities and natural immunity as well as various interventions to boost the immune system.

Thing is, why have you not conducted a thorough literature review? That’s an important step in forming an opinion. The academic papers are very easy to find. Why do you need my help? Why haven’t you found them already on your own?

My guess is that you never look.

tokeless wrote:Wow...Bill Gates really does have unlimited powers if he can do that too! I might offset the flowers business with a boat one. I mean, those who survive will need boats, right?

Houseboats. That is where the real money will be made.

theforsaken wrote:"Dictator Dan" is another nickname he's been given That's pretty fitting

It's much more appropriate than "dastardly"... although according to the OED
dastard, n. Coward skulker, esp. one who commits brutal act without endangering himself.

If Riccardo Bosi makes good on his warning, Andrews and all other Australian signatories to the coronahoax will be endangering themselves if they haven't come clean by the end of the month.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:Try researchgate or academia.com.

Disappointing.

I've looked at hundreds of links, including academic and official government ones, about the killer jabs, the effects of "covid measures", and the move towards global control of citizens via vaxxpasses. As of now you haven't offered a single link, or even proposed a search term.

You wrote that your qualified people had shown you the world was not the dystopian, apocalyptic nightmare you attribute to my authorship, and I was curious as to how they'd been able to prove a negative to your satisfaction.

I understand that while you're self-employed in Colombia you needn't fear coerced "vaccination" or having to show a "health" passport to buy fresh food. Others on this thread are from the US and the UK, facing a winter in which coronaviruses of all kinds, chiefly the common cold, proliferate. When Our Johnson brings in his so-called Plan B with the harshest lockdown yet experienced outside Australia, our access to fresh air and Vitamin D will be restricted. I consider myself lucky to have a private garden where I won't have to cover my breathing apparatus with a cancer-causing mask. Many of we ordinary people do not.

Thing is, why have you not conducted a thorough literature review? That’s an important step in forming an opinion.

I form my opinions based on logic, personal observation, and wide reading. Academia is notably slow, with all that peer reviewing (quite rightly) going on, and the issue is right in our faces. Not yours, Richard, but the majority of US states and the whole of the UK. The forum itself is based in Scotland, where "experts" were said to be baffled by the sudden rise in heart attacks and blocked arteries over summer. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/myst ... -m253drrnf

Why do you need my help?

I don't, least of all when it comes to the state of play in the US, UK or Australia. Just one link to a scholarly work demonstrating we're NOT headed for disaster would have sufficed, but I'm not surprised you couldn't find one.

quietvoice wrote:

A TWEETER named NeverSleever wrote:The Ones That Want You To Take The mRNA Shots

Want To Connect You To The (IoB) The Internet of Bodies

Part of the 4th Industrial Revolution... Coincidence?

2 minute video

Starts with bloody Klaus Schwab, famous for saying
"You will own nothing, and you WILL be happy."

Happy little robot slaves, those who've somehow survived "booster" after "booster" after "booster" after "booster" after "vaccine" as the deaths and disabilities attributed to "variant" after "variant" after "variant" continue to mount up.

Who needs to go searching for evidence when you can see and hear the words from the many horses' mouths?

Candid wrote:If Riccardo Bosi makes good on his warning...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-Ph3w9cIRQ
Watch it before it gets taken down by the censors.

Candid wrote:

Candid wrote:If Riccardo Bosi makes good on his warning...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-Ph3w9cIRQ
Watch it before it gets taken down by the censors.

Beware controlled opposition, a la Trump/Qanon . . . keeping one filled with Hopium that someone else will get rid of the evil ones while we get to sit and watch. He is sitting with Charlie Ward which is concerning to me (I can't watch this one, sorry). I don't get "good vibes" here. ("Former" military "special forces" is suspect, imo. And as a leader of a political party he helps keep the govt. machine running!)

Candid wrote:I form my opinions based on logic, personal observation, and wide reading.

As do I.

And part of my readings include many of the topics you like to post, for example the news about the rise in cardiac related issues, or the decline in vaccine effectiveness, etc.

I do process plenty of content that is aligned with what you have shared in this forum.

…link to a scholarly work demonstrating we're NOT headed for disaster would have sufficed, but I'm not surprised you couldn't find one.

They are very easy to find Candid. The fact that YOU are unable to post a single work demonstrating we’re NOT headed for disaster is on you, not me. That you are unable to post a single link to information that is counter to your established beliefs speaks volumes.

You can’t do it, can you?

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:You can’t do it, can you?

Locate something proving the Five Eyes aren't headed for trouble? No. Nor can you or anyone else.

quietvoice wrote: I don't get "good vibes" here.

I do, despite the hippy-dippy stuff. What sticks in my mind is "I'm not a politician, I'm a soldier". He knows full well he won't get A1 first past the post, but by standing he's going public in order that people will make contact. Banding together is our best hope, if not our only one.

I don't know about Charlie Ward, but it was his presence that persuaded Himself to join me in watching it. I gather Charlie's a mate of Simon Parkes, another one H follows. I'm flat out dealing with the prick-and-pass thing that directly affects me, without all the off-world, HM's part lizard, freemasonry rules stuff.

I'm keen to know what theforsaken, as our man on the spot, thinks about it. For myself, I appreciate Bosi's passion.

Flowers it is then. They can take my freedom but they'll never take my flowers.[/quote]
That's funny, you're a funny guy tokeless, I hope you're allowed to make jokes and grow flowers in your new world order.[/quote]

No I'm not, really. I am on death row now according to the death shot brigade. There's nothing funny about that.... what will be funny is when I'm still posting when all this dies down, which it will and you'll feel like Dorothy in Wizard of Oz when she realises it was all a dream. I really am looking forward to what gets said then... that will be funny.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... f-lockdown

Surely this is a lie by the MSM?

Candid wrote:Locate something proving the Five Eyes aren't headed for trouble? No. Nor can you or anyone else.

Quite the double standard you have going on. I thought you said you like to use logic?

You claim that proof the world is headed into the abyss is being censored. I agree with you. There is censorship of information that goes against the apocalyptic narrative. Yet, we are still able to find the information and post links.

What other information is out there Candid? Logically, when you search for information on COVID is your computer screen blank? Or is it filled with information that is counter to the apocalyptic narrative? Those links are available. There are plenty of them. They are not being censored.

You have to dig through all the information that demonstrates the world is not headed down a dark path to find the morsels you use to paint the narrative you like to promote. You are blind to the thousands of links, all of the academic work, all of the information that is counter to your beliefs.

How is that possible?

How is it possible that you dismiss 100% of any information that goes against your dark narrative. There is a lot of great information out there that shows the world is not headed of a cliff anytime soon, but you conveniently close your eyes to all of it.

It is similar to quietvoices being unable to post a single link about the potential benefits of eating meat. It isn’t that the information is not available. The links are all over the place. There is plenty of evidence that goes counter to the narrative quietvoice wants to push. Therefore, quietvoice is blind, incapable of an open minded discussion that posts both the positives and negatives of various diets.

You are the same with COVID. You have a double standard, same as quietvoice. If it supports your beliefs you post it. If it doesn’t support your beliefs you are blind to it. That’s not using logic.