The Black Pill

tokeless wrote:That's a quote from one person in the documentary.. watch it?

You are saying that someone has identified "michelle obama" as of the male gender, are you not?

Study the video that I posted. Figure it out for yourself.

quietvoice wrote:

tokeless wrote:That's a quote from one person in the documentary.. watch it?

You are saying that someone has identified "michelle obama" as of the male gender, are you not?

Study the video that I posted. Figure it out for yourself.

That's what the Qanon guy thinks... "Nobody's seen her pregnant have they?" Was another cracker from this guys associate.

tokeless wrote:

quietvoice wrote:You are saying that someone has identified "michelle obama" as of the male gender, are you not?

Study the video that I posted. Figure it out for yourself.

That's what the Qanon guy thinks... "Nobody's seen her pregnant have they?" Was another cracker from this guys associate.

If I read your response correctly, what you are doing is ignoring the content of my post.

Please study the 15 minute video and figure it out for yourself.

If you don't want to go to a link that I provide, find another source to study the difference in anatomy between the male body and the female body.

quietvoice wrote:If I read your response correctly, what you are doing is ignoring the content of my post.

Ignoring the useless content you typically provide? Sounds reasonable to me.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:Ignoring the useless content you typically provide? Sounds reasonable to me.

Aren't you the Quintessential MVP. Not.

It is useless to know the difference between sexes in one's fellow humans. Good to know. Thanks, Richard. You are a world of knowledge.


....FIRSTTHEYIGNOREYOU,THENTHEYLAUGHATYOU....

quietvoice wrote:It is useless to know the difference between sexes in one's fellow humans. Good to know. Thanks, Richard.

Quietvoice, all tokeless noted was that in a documentary it was mentioned that Michelle Obama was a male.

Your response? To condescend and tell tokeless to study a link regarding differences between the sexes.

My response? To point out that ignoring what you post is often a good strategy, because what you post is often of little, if any value. Tokeless, nor any other member needs a lecture on identifying the sexes based on the claim in a documentary that Michelle Obama is a man.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:

quietvoice wrote:It is useless to know the difference between sexes in one's fellow humans. Good to know. Thanks, Richard.

Quietvoice, all tokeless noted was that in a documentary it was mentioned that Michelle Obama was a male.

Your response? To condescend and tell tokeless to study a link regarding differences between the sexes.

My response? To point out that ignoring what you post is often a good strategy, because what you post is often of little, if any value. Tokeless, nor any other member needs a lecture on identifying the sexes based on the claim in a documentary that Michelle Obama is a man.

Everybody needs to study said subject. Why? If done seriously, the person who undertakes such study will find a different world than that which they beforehand thought to be so.

It was NOT a statement of condescension to tokeless, not in the least. It is simply that so few people have made such a specific study of that subject. Those who haven't are fooled by what is presented to them in our manufactured culture.

THE DECEIVERS exist all around you and I.

quietvoice wrote:Everybody needs to study said subject.

Not based on the observation that Michelle Obama is a man, they don’t.

I can’t speak for tokeless, but I studied anatomy in grade school, high school, and college. Multiple classes. To my knowledge basic anatomy is still taught in schools.

The idea that you offer to “study” to educate people on the true anatomy of Michelle Obama is a waste of time. It’s my opinion. Most of what you offer can be safely ignored.

It was NOT a statement of condescension to tokeless, not in the least. It is simply that so few people have made such a specific study of that subject. Those who haven't are fooled by what is presented to them in our manufactured culture.

THE DECEIVERS exist all around you and I.

Well, well. I have just 'studied' your video, the one that would educate me about the difference in anatomy... besides the almost android narration, the information is as far from related to my post as it could be. I feel I can now say with confidence that you're a crank. You avoid any alternative information and i think you probably believe Michelle Obama isn't a woman because I am struggling to understand why you would post such a video in relation to my post, other than to just disagree or question it. Are you Qanon QV? There is nothing useful in your videos other than they make you believe you are somehow above others in your understanding of the world and all within it...

tokeless wrote:Well, well. I have just 'studied' your video, the one that would educate me about the difference in anatomy... besides the almost android narration, the information is as far from related to my post as it could be. I feel I can now say with confidence that you're a crank. You avoid any alternative information and i think you probably believe Michelle Obama isn't a woman because I am struggling to understand why you would post such a video in relation to my post, other than to just disagree or question it. Are you Qanon QV? There is nothing useful in your videos other than they make you believe you are somehow above others in your understanding of the world and all within it...

Now apply your studies to the person named "michelle obama". < < <This is precisely what I meant when I said to "figure it out for yourself".

Take the knowledge from your anatomy lesson and see that those who present themselves as women are not necessarily so.

Get past your conditioning and open your eyes WIDE, very, very wide, my dear.

(You think that the narrator has an android voice? I think that in this case, your prejudgment of me is getting in the way of your perception—in my opinion, of course.)

tokeless wrote:Well, well. I have just 'studied' your video, the one that would educate me about the difference in anatomy... the information is as far from related to my post as it could be.

Tokeless politely indulged quietvoice.

quietvoice wrote:Now apply your studies to the person named "michelle obama".

Take the knowledge from your anatomy lesson and see that those who present themselves as women are not necessarily so.

Reinforcing why generally speaking people are safe to ignore what quietvoice offers.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:The idea that you offer to “study” to educate people on the true anatomy of Michelle Obama is a waste of time.

In your opinion, it is a waste of time. Then don't do it. No one is making YOU do it. Others may be interested, especially as this thread is entitled The Black Pill, but YOU, the MVP, think it is a waste of time. No worries, just DON'T waste your time doing it. Simple and easy peasy.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:Most of what you offer can be safely ignored.

You are absolutely FREE TO IGNORE ME !!!!!

So, ignore me. Please.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:Reinforcing why generally speaking people are safe to ignore what quietvoice offers.

Glad the MVP is here offering guidance at the crosswalk for those who can't think for themselves in navigating the postings around here. Now, they don't have to feel bad for ignoring what they don't want to hear.

What a safe board this is while the MVP is on duty.

quietvoice wrote:In your opinion, it is a waste of time. Then don't do it. No one is making YOU do it.

True. But that is your little trick. You post your links and then accuse people of “blathering” or not caring if they don’t watch your “educational” material. You state if they will not be educated by the links you have so graciously provided, then they don’t care about the truth.

As previously stated, you use the tactic of zealots.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:Most of what you offer can be safely ignored.

You are absolutely FREE TO IGNORE ME !!!!!

So, ignore me. Please.

I do ignore you.

That doesn’t mean I “add foe” you. That is different than ignoring…

Hmmm, maybe ignore is the wrong term…

Disregard. That is a better term. People can largely disregard the advice you have to offer.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:True. But that is your little trick. You post your links and then accuse people of “blathering” or not caring if they don’t watch your “educational” material. You state if they will not be educated by the links you have so graciously provided, then they don’t care about the truth.

In the context of this item, I offered definite evidence of foul play at a specific place in the document. Did anyone actually look at it and discuss the item in question. OR, DID THEY ATTACK THE MESSENGER INSTEAD???

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:Disregard. That is a better term. People can largely disregard the advice you have to offer.

So? That can apply everywhere and to everyone. Why waste YOUR time writing about it? Why draw attention to it if you are so insistent that I, or my advice, should be disregarded?





--------What or who are you protecting, Richard?--------