This is becoming a great thread!
Here's a quote from R.D. Laing:
"The range of what we think and do is limited by what we fail to notice - and because we
fail to notice that we fail to notice, there is nothing we can do to change until we notice."
You can see the connection between this and what Mike was saying about how we filter out things which are not in line with our current set of beliefs, and with atci's comment about how tricky it is to experiment with different sets of beliefs.
When you experimentally assume a different set of beliefs, and act as if that set was "true", it can feel very uncomfortable, and all those questions about madness, and right and wrong, come into your head, and very soon you can find yourself heading right back into your own currently held set of beliefs.
But of course, logic tells us that our "current set of beliefs" must be subject to exactly the same questions. Am I mad to believe what I believe now? Am I right or wrong to believe this? It's just harder to apply those questions, because "what I believe"
feels right (which is not the same thing as saying that I like what I believe, of course
).
However, making an effort to ask the questions, to challenge the apparent "obvious rightness" of what I myself think, is one way we have of thinking "out of the box" in which we are confined (or at least of lifting the lid
).
We can go on about the philosophical implications of this (it is very interesting), but more useful might be to stick with the question Mike posed: What is the
use of this belief? What practical purpose does it serve? If I continue to believe in it, does that help me to function better in my life and world, or does it hinder me?
I guess, from what atci and albert are saying, that they currently find this belief a hindrance, at least in the sense that they experience uncomfortable and unwelcome emotions in relation to it, and then find it hard to enjoy the life that they have.
However, I know of several people who find this same belief very liberating - to them it means that they are free to "make their own meaning" rather than to search for ever for a "grand plan" imposed by some outside force. If it doesn't matter very much what you do, then you can certainly do what you like to do, and be the kind of person you like to be. So you can be a "good person", not because you follow a moral law given by religion or society, and are good in order to earn spiritual reward later or avoid punishment now, but because you yourself
like being good.
Enough, already! It's early in the morning!
Kathleen