Your baked brain.

No black pill kill shots to focus on QV? I'm still alive and kicking

tokeless wrote:No black pill kill shots to focus on QV? I'm still alive and kicking

Another effect of these culturally-popular shots is that the injectee appears to be losing his/her mind, slowly but surely.

quietvoice wrote:

tokeless wrote:No black pill kill shots to focus on QV? I'm still alive and kicking

Another effect of these culturally-popular shots is that the injectee appears to be losing his/her mind, slowly but surely.

At last, some signs of insight.... fingers crossed it lasts

tokeless wrote:

quietvoice wrote:Another effect of these culturally-popular shots is that the injectee appears to be losing his/her mind, slowly but surely.

At last, some signs of insight.... fingers crossed it lasts

That's an interesting response. Please expand on your thoughts!

thread title
YOUR BAKED BRAIN

tokeless wrote:What are the chem trails for? What do they contain that makes them a threat?

They are certainly not contrails, as we're accustomed to seeing from planes and which soon disperse.

KNOWN EFFECTS OF GRAPHENE OXIDE NANOPARTICLES (in all four of the jabs)
 Graphene Oxide acidifies & thickens the blood and causes clotting
 GO nanoparticles resonate & become ‘excited’ with 5G
 GO nanoparticles damage haemaglobin in red blood cells
 GO nanoparticles destroy cell membrane
 GO nanoparticles use up our Glutathione reserves
 GO nanoparticles seem to assemble ‘intelligently’ in the body.
 GO nanoparticles are now found in chemtrails i.e. in the air we breathe.
 If accumulated in the lungs, GO can cause loss of taste and smell, shortness of breath & combined with parasites in the lungs can cause pneumonia.

KNOWN EFFECTS OF SYNTHETIC MRNA
There are billions of Synthetic MNRA nanoparticles in each injection that enter the bloodstream and end up in tiny capillaries throughout our body. There they program cells’ DNA to produce synthetic ‘non-human’ spike proteins that make the hitherto silky smooth lining of blood vessels ‘spiky’ and cause platelets in the blood to believe the blood vessel walls are damaged, so they create microclots around the spikes. Many of these spike proteins end up in the reproductive organs, causing experts to believe they are programmed to do so, causing bleeding and infertility. According to Dr Charles Hoffe these microclots are found in over 60% of vaccine recipients within a week of the jab (D-Dimer test). Also according to Dr Hoffe these microclots are also found in the capillaries that feed the lungs, making it harder for the lungs to exchange CO2 and O2, so the heart pumps harder and blood pressure goes up.

quietvoice wrote:Another effect of these culturally-popular shots is that the injectee appears to be losing his/her mind, slowly but surely.

I've noticed that, too. Waste of time and energy talking to them once they've succumbed.

And btw thanks for that Gibraltar link!

Candid wrote:

quietvoice wrote:Another effect of these culturally-popular shots is that the injectee appears to be losing his/her mind, slowly but surely.

I've noticed that, too. Waste of time and energy talking to them once they've succumbed.

Yes. I've noticed some of it myself, and have seen many online comments from others.

Candid wrote:And btw thanks for that Gibraltar link!

I did see a short video on Gibraltar this morning. It wasn't me who posted a link.

Candid wrote:

quietvoice wrote:Another effect of these culturally-popular shots is that the injectee appears to be losing his/her mind, slowly but surely.

I've noticed that, too. Waste of time and energy talking to them once they've succumbed.

And btw thanks for that Gibraltar link!

That's the best bit of news I've heard for sometime... please stick by it.

tokeless wrote:

Candid wrote:I've noticed that, too. Waste of time and energy talking to them once they've succumbed.

That's the best bit of news I've heard for sometime... please stick by it.

She provided an answer to your chem(ical) trail question. Will you ignore her answer, or will you take it into consideration?


thread title
YOUR BAKED BRAIN

No Candid hasn't. She's linked graphine oxide which she says is in the jabs and linked it to chem trails.... the scientists have debunked the chem trails conspiracy, but no, Candid is more knowledgable than them all, except the ones she believes in. The scientists which you will try and tell me are bought by the man, the system, the matrix breathe the same air we do, so they have in fact done this to themselves??? Jesus christ... is there no reasoning with you both? The chem trails have been a product of aviation for decades and yet, here we are, breathing the polluted air and no mass deaths. You just spout paranoid beliefs and attack people who don't agree.. hence why I was pleased by her comment to stop talking to me...

tokeless wrote:No Candid hasn't. She's linked graphine oxide which she says is in the jabs and linked it to chem trails.... the scientists have debunked the chem trails conspiracy, but no, Candid is more knowledgable than them all, except the ones she believes in. The scientists which you will try and tell me are bought by the man, the system, the matrix breathe the same air we do, so they have in fact done this to themselves??? Jesus christ... is there no reasoning with you both? The chem trails have been a product of aviation for decades and yet, here we are, breathing the polluted air and no mass deaths. You just spout paranoid beliefs and attack people who don't agree.. hence why I was pleased by her comment to stop talking to me...

So, the answer is that you won't take it into consideration. Why did you bother asking . . .


thread title
YOUR BAKED BRAIN

I have considered it. I read it, looked it up and dismissed it as not factual because there is no basis of truth in it. GO isn't considered toxic in most cases. It was shown to cause some lung problems in mice, but as with most animal experiments the doses are higher than we would be exposed to. It is not uncommon to use chemicals that are toxic or hazardous if used in higher concentrations, which is why their use is regulated strictly. You seem to think because I don't clap like a seal when shown something, I haven't bothered to think about it. Have you ever considered you might be wrong in what you believe to be true?

tokeless wrote: Have you ever considered you might be wrong in what you believe to be true?

Yes, if it is a belief, because belief is not knowledge.

From what sources did you take your information? Please share, so that I can see how you are convinced of the falsity in the case.

What did you look at that showed otherwise? Please share those sources.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414724/

https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... chemtrails

There's loads of stuff, but I doubt it will make much difference. I really can't be arsed with this. I work with delusional people every day and it's recommended you never try and rationalise reality because they are deluded and not irrational.

tokeless wrote:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih gov/pmc/articles/PMC5414724/

https //www theguardian com/environment/2017/may/22/california-conspiracy-theorist-farmers-chemtrails

There's loads of stuff, but I doubt it will make much difference. I really can't be arsed with this. I work with delusional people every day and it's recommended you never try and rationalise reality because they are deluded and not irrational.

These are mainstream sources. What that means,, if you don't know, is that they always spout The Official Narrative. <<<do you know what that even means?

So you didn't bother to look at alternative information. The Official Narrative provides only that which the powers-that-be want you to hear. Nothing more than that, EVER. That's reality, buddy.