by kfedouloff » Tue May 25, 2004 3:51 pm
I thought that was very clearly expressed, soulbound - it releases the pain inside, and almost distracts you from it. That fits in well with what Mike was saying about the behaviour having a "good intention". Then, if you find a way of satisfying the intention (even if it has downsides, like cutting), you may tend to continue with that, because it works. If you make attempts to stop the behaviour, without finding some other way to satisfy the intention, you may find it very difficult, or may find that you actually sabotage your own efforts!
There's two stages to getting out of this bind, as I see it. The first is to identify, by whatever means possible, other satisfactory ways of getting the intention satisfied. But knowing of a suitable alternative is not enough by itself. We have still to overcome the blinkered approach of the behaviour ("this works, so this is what I will do").
A good way to do this is to think of the behaviour as a "part" of the personality, with its own special role. We all have lots of parts which go to make up the totality of who we are. What seems a bit odd about us is that these parts seem to operate in isolation from each other - it's as if each part pursues its own "good intention" without any awareness of the conflicting intentions of other parts.
But with imagination (on your own, or with the help of a therapist), you can bring these parts to life as "characters" in your play, and introducethem to each other, and get them to explain to each other (and to you) what all the good intentions are.
Now, by definition every part has a good intention for the person. If they all know of each other's intentions, and agree that they want the good of the person, you can get a negotiation going whereby all the good intentions are creatively met, without them stepping on each other's toes!
The best role for the "person" in this scenario is to act as chair of the meeting, and keep them all in order! After all, they are there for your good!
It works!
Kathleen