Neurotypical married to a man with aspergers syndrome

tokeless wrote:Do you know anyone in the real world, you know, that you don't inflate?

LOL!

tokeless wrote:


Of course I am creepy guy... such a lonely, saddo existence you have. Do you know anyone in the real world, you know, that you don't inflate?

I do. I'm even good-looking (your mileage may vary). But I get a kick out of you thinking I'm a creep.

Algorithm wrote:

tokeless wrote:


Of course I am creepy guy... such a lonely, saddo existence you have. Do you know anyone in the real world, you know, that you don't inflate?

I do. I'm even good-looking (your mileage may vary). But I get a kick out of you thinking I'm a creep.

Well, at least one of us is... I don't care what you think because you are an irrelevance to me. I just think you're a sad sack who lives on the net. Why don't you PM Desperate... such fun, posting irrelevant thoughts with no intention of changing anything... pure indulgence. Enjoy

tokeless wrote:
Well, at least one of us is... I don't care what you think because you are an irrelevance to me. I just think you're a sad sack who lives on the net. Why don't you PM Desperate... such fun, posting irrelevant thoughts with no intention of changing anything... pure indulgence. Enjoy

You on the other hand seem likeable.

Algorithm wrote:

tokeless wrote:
Well, at least one of us is... I don't care what you think because you are an irrelevance to me. I just think you're a sad sack who lives on the net. Why don't you PM Desperate... such fun, posting irrelevant thoughts with no intention of changing anything... pure indulgence. Enjoy

You on the other hand seem likeable.

I am... my friends would agree. What about you?

tokeless wrote:

I am... my friends would agree. What about you?

Really? You seem like a Dick to me (the name Dick that is).

See how smart I am?

I am not looking to make conversation with you, so take a hike.

Algorithm wrote:

tokeless wrote:

I am... my friends would agree. What about you?

Really? You seem like a Dick to me (the name Dick that is).

See how smart I am?

I am not looking to make conversation with you, so take a hike.

It's a public forum, buddy. Perhaps it is you who needs a break from here.

Algorithm wrote:See how smart I am?

Yes. I do see how smart you currently are.

I think most people see how smart you are. And no worries, you can still improve. You don’t need to be without a career or intimate relationship permanently. You can get smarter. We all can.

Algorithm wrote:

tokeless wrote:

I am... my friends would agree. What about you?

Really? You seem like a Dick to me (the name Dick that is).

See how smart I am?

I am not looking to make conversation with you, so take a hike.

I'm getting my kicks on route 66.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote: You don’t need to be without a[n] . . . intimate relationship permanently.

Really not a good idea to encourage him to destroy another person's life. There's no such thing as into-me-see for him, only someone to be caretaker to him.

tokeless wrote:I'm getting my kicks on route 66.

My hubby was second person (or in the second car?) up the Arch in St Louis when it opened, with a certificate to show for it. Yeah!

quietvoice wrote:Really not a good idea to encourage him to destroy another person's life. There's no such thing as into-me-see for him, only someone to be caretaker to him.

I'm an aspie monster looking to prey on the souls of innocent neurotypicals. Especially online! (yummy).

~

On the other hand, I had just answered based on the remnants of my normalcy bias. Really, The World Is Rapidly Changing, and he likely won't have enough time to find that supposed intimate partner.

quietvoice wrote:~

Really, The World Is Rapidly Changing, and he likely won't have enough time to find that supposed intimate partner.

Is the world coming to an end? If there was ever a time for spoiler alert!

quietvoice wrote:Really not a good idea to encourage him to destroy another person's life. There's no such thing as into-me-see for him, only someone to be caretaker to him.

I disagree. At his current level of "smartness" the value he offers an intimate partner is admittedly low. He is young, lacking life experience and full of hubris, living a sheltered existence. But, he is only 30.

To the extent future Algorithm is "smarter" than present day Algorithm, there is that potential. Twenty years from now he will only be fifty. A lot could change in that time...or not.

Richard@DecisionSkills wrote:

quietvoice wrote:Really not a good idea to encourage him to destroy another person's life. There's no such thing as into-me-see for him, only someone to be caretaker to him.

I disagree. At his current level of "smartness" the value he offers an intimate partner is admittedly low. He is young, lacking life experience and full of hubris, living a sheltered existence. But, he is only 30.

To the extent future Algorithm is "smarter" than present day Algorithm, there is that potential. Twenty years from now he will only be fifty. A lot could change in that time...or not.

Why do you think he will get better? His neurology will not change. This is a neurological condition that keeps him from being able to emotionally connect to another.