The Black Pill

tokeless wrote:Yeah, you are. You have rational point to make, so you beat the same drum. So, when is this thing, the real one thing, happening?

Where's that "virus" at, tokeless?????????

As I said before, when you provide an answer to this that resembles reality, we can take it [the topic] from there. Before that, anything that I say will fall on deaf ears.

Where, oh where, is that viiiiiirus at, oh where, oh where can it beeeee?

. . . before the discovery of viruses . . .

quietvoice wrote:How were "viruses" discovered?

Amanda Vollmer tells how "viruses" came about.

Have you visited the website yet that the World Economic Forum has out there in that Wild Wild West of the Internet?

To tokeless, take two:

Did you ever acknowledge that there actually are deaths from the "vaccine" and did you ever acknowledge that there are people who are actually seriously injured from the "vaccine"?

I don't remember if you have or not.

quietvoice wrote:To tokeless, take two:

Did you ever acknowledge that there actually are deaths from the "vaccine" and did you ever acknowledge that there are people who are actually seriously injured from the "vaccine"?

I don't remember if you have or not.

No, I haven't, because outside of an adverse reaction to the vaccination, it is unlikely to have caused death or serious harm. Now, the virus has claimed many lives, but you don't think it exists, which is delusional. There is no evidence that would override your belief. However, you could say when it gets real, real, but you refuse.... that's because you are delusional. You're also a fraud.

tokeless wrote:

quietvoice wrote:To tokeless, take two:
Did you ever acknowledge that there actually are deaths from the "vaccine" and did you ever acknowledge that there are people who are actually seriously injured from the "vaccine"?
I don't remember if you have or not.

No, I haven't, because outside of an adverse reaction to the vaccination, it is unlikely to have caused death or serious harm.

So, even though you've been directed through this forum a number of times to go to the VAERS website, you haven't done so. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Do those reports mean nothing?

tokeless wrote:Now, the virus has claimed many lives, but you don't think it exists, which is delusional. There is no evidence that would override your belief.

How do you know that it was a "virus" that killed them? What proof do YOU have that this is TRUE?


PROOF, my dear one, not just hearsay.

Again, tell me what you know about that research tool called the PCR. Is this how you think you know that people died of a "virus"?

tokeless wrote:However, you could say when it gets real, real, but you refuse.... that's because you are delusional. You're also a fraud.

You haven't met the condition that I have pointed out to you twice. Do I need to repeat it?
Short answer: Real Soon.

tokeless wrote:Yeah, you are. You have rational point to make, so you beat the same drum. So, when is this thing, the real one thing, happening?

Where's that "virus" at, tokeless?????????

As I said before, when you provide an answer to this that resembles reality, we can take it [the topic] from there. Before that, anything that I say will fall on deaf ears.

Where, oh where, is that viiiiiirus at, oh where, oh where can it beeeee?

. . . before the discovery of viruses . . .

quietvoice wrote:How were "viruses" discovered?

Amanda Vollmer tells how "viruses" came about.

Have you visited the website yet that the World Economic Forum has out there in that Wild Wild West of the Internet?

Again, tell me what you know about that research tool called the PCR. Is this how you think you know that people died of a "virus"?

You need to read up on what a PCR test is. The short version is it detects the presence of the viruses protein molecules. It doesn't have to include symptoms, therefore isn't to tell cause of death. That's an autopsy.
You deny the virus exists, so what killed those who died, but didn't have the vaccine? Because the vaccine couldn't have, if you didn't get it. This will be interesting.

tokeless wrote:You need to read up on what a PCR test is.

First off, it's not a test. It's a way to amplify that at which you are looking.

tokeless wrote:The short version is it detects the presence of the viruses protein molecules.

It amplifies the genetic material at which one is looking. It detects that which it is [programmed] to detect. What is it detecting if a virus has not been isolated—what did they do, did they make up a sequence? (In fact, that is exactly what they did.)

tokeless wrote:It doesn't have to include symptoms, therefore isn't to tell cause of death.

No. The PCR research tool doesn't give a hoot about symptoms. You're right.

tokeless wrote:. . . therefore isn't to tell cause of death. That's an autopsy.

People fraudulently use this research tool as a prop to convince those who are dumb enough not to know better that a subject (could be a person, a kiwi, or some motor oil) is or is not diagnosed with a made-up disease.

tokeless wrote:You deny the virus exists, so what killed those who died, but didn't have the vaccine?

There are a few causes. Maybe, if you did a little research, you could find out for yourself what those causes are. You may even find some shenanigans going on in the medical facilities. Don't be surprised if you do.

tokeless wrote:This will be interesting.

Yes.
Did you get to that V.A.E.R.S. site yet?
How about the WEF site?

You're not very well mentally. Pointless discussion with you. You deny reality..

tokeless wrote:You're not very well mentally. Pointless discussion with you. You deny reality..

I'm pretty sad, aren't I?




You think I'm as bad as desperate?

quietvoice wrote:

tokeless wrote:You're not very well mentally. Pointless discussion with you. You deny reality..

I'm pretty sad, aren't I?

I think you have lost a grip on reality.... you won't see it because you have no insight.

You think I'm as bad as desperate?[/quotei]

No, he's not a fraud.

quietvoice wrote:

davidbanner99@ wrote:This randomly found about cult programming.

No, davidbanner, it was NOT found randomly. You search for that topic or it came up as suggested based on past searches. Get Real.

davidbanner, you didn't answer my question. Is the World Economic Forum website a conspiracy site?

In the 1980s I read a fair bit on cults and deprogramming. Around the 1970s, The Moonies (or Unification Church) had had major success breaking up families. Lots of idealists such as our Candid were attracted to the organization. You also had The Children Of God cult and Scientology. All this reading involved "books" as well as meeting cult members.
Posting links to whatever official source you choose to reproduce doesn't impact the fundamental reality I put to you. The conspiracy cult leaders are all Americans as are the Benny Hinn TV evangelists. I checked many of these figures out and, yes, they are making plenty of revenue. It's a business full of spin and con merchants. It extends from the modern conspiracies, as far back as UFO cult leaders and the dreaded "abductees". Names? Try Bud Hopkins who hopped on the bandwagon as "hypnotist abductee researcher". Another American may I add - it seems aliens only want to crash land in one country and collaborate with one government.
It's a lot of nonsense And please Candid, take a little time to do background checks on these so-called doctors. What I found was overflowing bank accounts and fly-by-night Phds.

quietvoice wrote:

tokeless wrote:You're not very well mentally. Pointless discussion with you. You deny reality..

I'm pretty sad, aren't I?

No, you're a fraud.


You think I'm as bad as desperate?[/quote

No, he accepts he's not well and needs help.

PS, Tokeless, to get into emotional arguments isn't how deprogrammers operate. It entrenches the other person. Q.V. in time may start to question but not under pressure. It could take maybe two years for a cult member to be free.

davidbanner99@ wrote:PS, Tokeless, to get into emotional arguments isn't how deprogrammers operate. It entrenches the other person. Q.V. in time may start to question but not under pressure. It could take maybe two years for a cult member to be free.

I'm not here to indulge cranks.... I have no interest in deprogramming. I have called out QV and she can't engage in reality, therefore attacks anyone that doesn't conform to her view. The mistrust of the internet is hilarious, seeing as she spouts nonsense on it. When does it get real, real David... do you know?

You should, though, Tokeless, be aware by now to get into emotional standoffs entrenches a view. Nobody wants to lose face. At some point a debate becomes about who's right.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-wQv46G07c