Watch this, if you dare . . .

biohack9 wrote:Wow you really are a special one.

“The virus spread globally prior to vaccinations”.

Dunning Kruger.

You have no idea what Dunning Kruger is.

You’re that dim that you don’t even know why. Classic. Enjoy your religion.

Those ignorant of what the researchers Dunning and Kruger actually found, often try to use it as a form of ad hominem.

For those interested in what the Dunning Kruger effect actually is, here is the original research…

https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/1999-kruger.pdf

It is all about peer (in group comparison). It isn’t about cross group comparisons. Biohack is not in my peer group, nor I in his.

Dunning-Kruger effect, in psychology, a cognitive bias whereby people with limited knowledge or competence in a given intellectual or social domain greatly overestimate their own knowledge or competence in that domain relative to objective criteria or to the performance of their peers or of people in general.

Classic. Keep digging.

biohack9 wrote:…in that domain relative to objective criteria or to the performance of their peers…

I can cut/paste from Wikipedia as well. Read the actual research.

-1- it’s domain specific.
-2- objective criteria.
-3- peer comparison.

You know more than me about objective criteria in the domain of addiction to marijuana, I’m a novice. You are an expert. I’m not actually your peer in this domain.

What’s funny, is you cut/paste the Wikipedia, without actually understanding what you were pasting.

It is used as a common ad hominem these days. Pathetic.

What’s pathetic is how you are too dim to see the forest for the trees as well as Dunning Kruger. And believe in religion as fact and then spout about coincidence and numbers. Can’t argue with a nimrod. Enjoy your life of fear and ignorance.

biohack9 wrote:What’s pathetic is how you are too dim to see the forest for the trees as well as Dunning Kruger. And believe in religion as fact and then spout about coincidence and numbers. Can’t argue with a nimrod. Enjoy your life of fear and ignorance.

I believe in religion as fact? Nope.

Maybe why you struggle with addiction to weed and needing to practice no fap, is because of some underlying misunderstandings, some dysfunctional beliefs that are not helping you out.

I agree, you can’t argue with a nimrod. Nice ad hominem btw.

I am enjoying life, free of addictions. You? As far as ignorance? I am certainly ignorant about most things. We all are.

You don’t even understand how you believe in a religion.

I have never struggled with weed addiction. Nice assumption/delusion. I can and have quit exactly when I have wanted with zero cravings.

I don’t need to practice nofap. Just because I post a forum doesn’t mean I have addictions to whacking off. Wow you’re even dimmer than I originally thought. But keep assuming.

Dunning Kruger. Is it an ad hominem if it’s true? While you peacock logical fallacies in your deluded dim minded and witted world?

biohack9 wrote: I have never struggled with weed addiction.

biohack9 wrote:I can empathize on the sleep issues even before quitting, my main one was the night sweats but I did sleep much better and deeper before the quit. I pray that I will also have somewhat more normal patterns around 6 months or even if it takes longer. I just need to see some progress. So far the quality of my life on weed was at least 80-90% better than it is now off of it.

Okay.

I stopped taking magnesium too. Must of had a magnesium addiction. Good thing I’m following a 12 step program for it. Dunning Kruger.

biohack9 wrote:I stopped taking magnesium too. Must of had a magnesium addiction. Good thing I’m following a 12 step program for it. Dunning Kruger.

Great. Hope it helps with your ongoing struggles and your prayers. Addiction must not be easy.

biohack9 wrote:Wow you really are a special one.

“The virus spread globally prior to vaccinations”.

Dunning Kruger.

What is it about facts that you struggle with? The vaccine was created in response to the global spread of the virus, therefore the virus came first..... unless, unless, you think it was given to people with the vaccine?

biohack9 wrote:anyone who predicts what’s happening now in 2017 deserves the time.

There were certainly plenty of others who knew what was coming. On 13/10/2015 Richard Rothschild started investing in a system and method designed to test for something that had been named, for no reason that was immediately apparent, Covid-19.

By 2017 most countries knew of Rothschild's investment and were buying test kits for something that still appeared to be two years into the future. What did the leaders of those countries know that their citizens didn't?

The earliest covid-19 jab I've seen (AstraZeneca) has the manufacture date of 15/7/2018. That's not to say there weren't earlier ones.

But perhaps you meant predictions from people who weren't in on the plandemic. It turns out we had at least one of them on the forum as long ago as 2010. viewtopic.php?t=60580&p=603674#p603674, from which I quote:
Let take another example, lets say you are mandated to be given a immunization in a massive plague outbreak. There are limited supplies and you have been chosen randomly to be immunized. You would be very happy right? Well, let's say you believed that the government was actually the one infecting people, how do you suppose that you would react?

Aldous Huxley had more than an inkling long before that, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alasBxZsb40. So did George Orwell, of course: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFvuzu8vtY8

Why did the UK Government's chief propaganda wing not only post the Orwell link on 10/6/19, but leave it there when the plandemic was officially announced a few months later?

Your guess is as good as mine—but what might any of us have done differently if we'd known what was coming?

tokeless wrote:The vaccine was created in response to the global spread of the virus, therefore the virus came first..... unless, unless, you think it was given to people with the vaccine?

Funny you should mention that. Can you spare two minutes?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR-pqrMWu3E&t=5s (under two minutes) or the explanatory version, https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/brief ... mpaign=usa, from which:
Such a correlation was recognized by Pfizer itself as revealed in a briefing document they submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on September 17. The briefing included a report of one of the pharmaceutical giant’s own studies indicating higher rates of infection following injections, equating to jab recipients becoming more susceptible to contracting covid-19.

Oh dear!