by Leo Volont » Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:41 pm
Hi Voyager, Yeah, I understand the dynamic you are explaining, that the Strong Lion has less to be angry about than the Cornered Rat. However, what I have found in my own life is that Strength Comes Before a Fall, that while in the sort of "manic" phase of riding high I would get a sense of Rank, Dominance, Status and Territory, and all those things are stuff that take defending. When I was just a member of the pack there wasn't anything special to defend, but once you have prestige and territory, then you are sort of held as an emotional hostage to that. A King has to live on top of the the Hill in a stone Castle, with crocodiles in the moot.
Oh, Vipassana Meditation. But don't you find South Asian Buddhism to be kind of cynical and nihilistic, especially when you are talking about Pali stuff that is supposed to be closer to the original Buddhism but I think what they mean is closer to the First Buddhist Reaction which mostly wiped out what the Buddha was actually talking about. You see, all that "Original Buddhism" retains so much of the ubiquitous Brahministic Beliefs of the Region: Reincarnation, Karmic Determination of Rebirth into Castes, that you have to ask yourself what was so revolutionary? "Suffering Sources from Desire. Things are Impermanent. There is the Doctrine of No-Soul but it is contradicted in all the non-sense that persists in maintaining Reincarnation and Karmic Re-Brith. Rebirth of WHAT!? SO, my intuition tells me that Buddha was just a typical 6th Century Philosopher who arrived at a basically Materialistic View of the World, that the Brahmins with their Caste System that had it's amoral foundation in the Principle that the Aryan Castes DESERVED to rule at the top because they EARNED the right over thousands of lives in which they themselves moved up from the Low Castes by doing their Duty impeccably. Buddha saw that as a huge scam! We KNOW how Life works: we are born once to biological parents and then we die. And there was no reason to be so pessimistic in tone: "Desire is Suffering". What about when you GET what you Desire? That ain't so bad, is it? I think were we get Cynical Pessimistic Doctrines is because Buddhism was connected almost from the start with Monasteries.
Voyager, have you ever thought about what a Monastery REALLY is? I've been to East Asia and I've seen for myself there, and the Western Monasteries run the same Business Model: they are ORPHANAGES. Yeah, these Feudal Societies are open to people only if they have Place and Standing. Disgraced people and those who are banished need somewhere to go and if they still have money then they can give a Monastery an Endowment for themselves and live out the rest of their lives behind the Walls without being bothered from the outside, you know, the Doctrine of Holy Sanctuary. But MOSTLY Monasteries are in the business of making unwanted babies go away. Poor people will hide a pregnant "virgin" daughter and then nose pinch the baby and throw it's body in the river. But Rich People have the resources to be more careful with the fragile feelings of the young girl involved and reassure her the baby will be sent to a Monastery and be a saint, and she herself can go back to being a virgin with a wax hymen on her wedding night.
Now think how you would administer a Monastery. You need to keep expenses down. Nobody is going to get fat. Meet eating is a Sin, and it is cheaper. Fasting is a virtue and the Monastery saves on it's food budget for two days a week. and THEN the Monastery doesn't want any trouble. really the whole idea behind Meditation, in the Monasteries is :